City of Dreams Summary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

City of Dreams Summary - Essay Example Inside the new arrangement they see new open doors for individuals such as themselves to create individual desire and later, a whole China. They are glad to feel less control from Communists Party. In spite of the fact that they know about stressed social circumstance, they accept it’s essential for nation to experience the period and structure a white collar class with a perspective on future success, and all the better they can do is to assist center with classing arrangement by close to home model. Simultaneously a tremendous piece of residents had all the earmarks of being not fitted for the new monetary strategy. Inside four years time frame a great deal of texture in Shanghai was shut, and around 24 million of texture laborers gave off an impression of being jobless (â€Å"China Rises †City of Dreams†). The majority of them have poor instruction and can't figure out how to get another line of work. To get instruction isn't an alternative as well, since training framework is business. Along these lines these days they are attempting their best to endure and furnish their families and kids even with fundamental expectations for everyday comforts, except holes among poor and white collar class and the most extravagant ones are gigantic. This causes a great deal of social issues. Something else that causes Shanghai social issues is its quick developed turn of events. So as to construct another houses and workplaces an old dwelling houses are destroyed. However tenants of those houses (regularly they are a similar jobless specialists) are dealt with unjustifiably by new structure financial specialists, and government represent the structure speculators, in light of the fact that new activities increment Shanghai monetary turn of events. To oppose the concealment without occupations and homes, and furthermore without suitable legislative help for these individuals is practically outlandish. Legal advisors state such cases are bound to come up short. There’s too enormous debasement in Shanghai legislative organizations. To my psyche, country’s government can't arrange privileges of its residents under any conditions. To smother one class so as to frame another

Managing a Large Financial Project Essay Example for Free

Dealing with a Large Financial Project Essay Presentation As the trough of an enormous budgetary venture for organization Bev shoes I am confronting a few difficulties. The task is running bogged down and we have another CEO. In the gathering with the CEO I needed to make him mindful that the venture cutoff time is in danger and his reaction was to take staff from a task with less significance and put them on the monetary undertaking. From the outside this resembles an extraordinary answer for the issue since more staff could complete the work quicker and set the task back on time. I need to differ with the CEO’s perspective in light of the fact that simply relegating more individuals to this task won't take care of the issue. We have to have staffs that are proficient in the business procedure and the innovation design identified with the money related venture. I will give my help to my reaction of why this is an impractical notion by first clarifying the significance of getting the business procedure accurately. Procedure Definition A business procedure is a gathering of exercises intended to make a particular yield for a particular goal. This is from having individuals and framework connections. Besides, a business procedure focuses on how the work is performed inside a business. This procedure ought to be plainly characterized with a beginning stage and an end point with input necessities and expected yield results. We invest a great deal of energy considering and understanding business process for this task and including new staff as of now would additionally broaden the course of events for this venture. On the budgetary undertaking, the staff comprises of people who have a profound comprehension of the business procedure as it identifies with what is being actualized. They have examined the current business process and are effectively taking a shot at actualizing of these procedures into the new financialâ system. As it were these staffs are viewed as a key client. As per Oliver Schmid †¦ [a] â€Å"key-client is a worker that is personally acquainted with all business procedures and necessities as it relate to their activity work or potentially department†. This happens to be the situation with the staff as of now in put on the budgetary undertaking. Innovation Architecture Plan The staff on the budgetary undertaking has just characterized the kinds of equipment, programming, and correspondence systems necessities .at the end of the day they have an innovation engineering plan set up for the money related task. So as to concoct this arrangement, the staff accomplished some examiner work in every segment of the innovation design. Laury Verner depicts a diagram of the innovation design: * Conceptual The theoretical region is the place we characterize the ‘what’. In innovation terms this implies ‘what’ innovation capacities are required to give the proper innovation framework to the endeavor. For instance, Data Integration Services is an innovation capacity that * Logical-The legitimate zone is the place we characterize the ‘how’. In innovation terms this is the following degree of deliberation of ‘how’ the ‘what’ will be accomplished. These arrangements as far as the classes of innovation and the innovation items that is accessible to understand the Technology Capabilities. * Physical The physical catches the execution and organizations of innovation in the undertaking. In the innovation layer this implies the most minimal degree of reflection and catches the occurrences of the innovation items and where they are truly conveyed. The staff has an away from of what work for the usage of this task and it is problematic to add staff to this venture they would need to invest energy preparing at this late stage (p.1). Effect from absence of Process and Standard A fruitful undertaking usage needs to stick to certain norm and procedure. The individual taking a shot at the monetary undertaking as of now has display this comprehension. Because we are delayed for finishing this venture doesn't imply that we can simply include more assets as the CEO suggested. The aftereffect of this would simply additionally defer the undertaking. Taking staff from a lesser significant venture to take a shot at thisâ financial venture implies that they need lucidity of the business procedure. This would require some critical measure of time to update them. This new staff would come in with a poor comprehension of the business procedure and at last effect the venture in a negative manner. Answer for CEO questions The answer for the issue with the money related venture falling delayed is to enlist specialist with ability in executing a monetary task of this greatness. These assets would accompany long periods of experienced and it would be simpler for them to comprehend the business procedure and the innovation design. This would return the task on target to complying with the time constraint. End Just adding more staff to the monetary venture isn't the answer for recovering this task on target to complying with time constraint as the CEO suggest. There are key procedure that an individual needs to see first before they can contribute this venture, for example, the business procedure and the innovation engineering. It is something other than including staff and that is the reason I suggest specialists with skill that can have a prompt effect. The goal is to recover the task on target and this is the best approach to accomplish that objective. References Satzinger, J.W., Jackson, R., Burd, S.D. (2009). Frameworks examination and plan in an evolving world (5th.ed.).Cengage Learning/Course Technology. Garbage, J. (2006). Undertaking Architecture VS. Innovation Architecture. Recovered August 9, 2012www.flashmapsystems.com/assets/articles/articles29.htm Verner, L. (2004).The Challenge of Process Discovery Retrieved August 9, 2012ww.w.bptrends.com//05-04%20WP%20Process%20Discovery%20-

Squarespace vs Weebly Comparison 2020 Who is better

Squarespace vs Weebly Comparison 2020 Who is better .elementor-19992 .elementor-element.elementor-element-19992{text-align:center}Last Updated on March 7, 2020You’ve probably heard of or ran into these two names while combing the internet for an easy way to build a website from scratch, and SquareSpace vs Weebly is one of the questions that often enter the heads of those who dont want to get really good at coding or web design in order to set up a decent website on their own.Thats how it used to be, you had to know at least basic coding to get going, but that has since changed, and these two companies are among the top tools that take the lead in making that possible. As easy-to-use website builders, they provide an affordable way to create a professional-looking website. Disclosure As an independent review site, we get compensated if you purchase through the referral links or coupon codes on this page â€" at no additional cost to you. Dismiss alert Obviously, the user experience is definitely not the same with each tool. In fact, I’ve recently seen lots of questions on which one is better among the two, and so, today I decided to help you figure that out.I’ll be delving deeper into how they compare based on top features and benefits, but before going any further, let’s get to know each of these tools better first.You may also like: SquareSpace review Weebly review Table of Contents More about Squarespace vs WeeblyWeebly vs Squarespace featuresEase of useDesignsSquareSpace vs Weebly SEOApp StoreBenefitsFlexibilityPricingTechnical supportWeebly vs Squarespace comparison conclusionMore about Squarespace vs WeeblyWhat’s common about these two tools is that they provide you with everything you need to build your website from scratch and grow it. I know that some people prefer to buy ‘parts’ of a website separately then install and manage them individually. Join the FREE TrainingDo You Want To Learn How To Build 6 Figures Authority Sites?Join This Free Training To...Finally have a proven meth od to finding profitable nichesGet access to a foolproof keyword research methodLearn how to outsource quality contentLearn how to build white hat links to your site without headaches Either way, if youre looking to start a blog or website, you might want to take into consideration the fact that website builders present an easy and affordable way to do that.Based on the most recent Google Trends Chart (shown below), over the last 8 years or so, Weebly seems to enjoy more searches online. Why I pointed this out is because I’ve seen a good number of people base their decision on which tool is more popular than the other. But there’s more beyond popularity as you will learn in a bit.Squarespace, on the other hand, prides itself in being one of the oldest website builders and targets creatives looking for high-quality designs and more creative control.Weebly vs Squarespace featuresEase of useWeeblyWeebly is easy to use and understand. The tool’s structured designs make it easy for you to decide what kind of website you want to build right away. Click here for current Squarespace pricing SquarespaceDespite being fairly intuitive, Squarespace’s editor is nothing like what you would experience with Weebly. Because of their attempt to please both technical users and “DIYers”, the editor is quite sophisticated. It might be awhile before you figure out how stuff works.Here, Weebly is well stocked, and offers a variety of apps designed to meet the diverse needs of your website. Squarespace relies on its built-in features, so how it would compare against its counterpart will depend on your needs.BenefitsFlexibilityWeeblyWeebly is a better option for novices, but given the slight differences between them in terms of designs, e-commerce, and flexibility, it would be upon the user to decide which one suits them best.Squarespace is evidently more complicated than Weebly, but it wins in other categories such as flexibility, SEO, and e-commerce. For the adv anced user who is in doubt about its capacity, you will be happy to know that there are a few more features this tool comes with. It’s up to you to give it a try and see how everything pans out.So who is the ultimate winner? Well, it’s difficult to point at one, because they both seem to target different users. Nevertheless, you can easily find what option suits you well by comparing your needs against the top features and benefits discussed here.Related articles BlueHost vs Squarespace Weebly alternatives Wix vs Squarespace Weebly vs GoDaddy

Summary on Service Encounter Journal - 1242 Words

SCO 3051/ Professor B. Azman Assignment #4 Summary of Service Encounter Journaling Service encounter is person-to-person interactions between customers and service providers. Over the past six weeks, I realized my interaction with the service providers played a vital role in improving my perceptions regarding service quality, as they also influenced my satisfaction and brand perception. As a result, the good service I received had increased my long-term loyalty, lead to positive word-of-mouth and higher profitability for the service organizations I encountered. On the other hand, I found those service organizations that provided unpleasant customer experiences were solely focused on operational profitability, rather than on creating†¦show more content†¦This principle reminded me a situation where I called T-Mobile Technical Support to figure a service outage issue. The informative customer service rep tracked down the origin of problem, explained the service recovery procedures to me professionally although he clearly spoke English with an Indian accent. He was also able to provide me the sense of control and the feeling of security by providing a service solution that stated power station would be recovered within 2 days. Meanwhile, the attitude of service providers had a strong impact on customer’s perception to the service encounter. I assessed my service encounters based on the attitude of service providers, their ability to fulfill special requests, and to execute service recovery in cases of a service failure. For example, in my customer experience with Starbucks, the barista ‘s attitude of going above and beyond expectations and her friendliness had positively influenced my perception of Starbucks, and thus increased my happiness and loyalty as customer. A Typical Service Failure and Recommendations for Potential Service Recovery Particularly, my experience encountered with Spirit Airline was a typical service failure and they should deliver a service recovery to retain customers. Ground crew announced the 2 hours flight delay mere seconds before the first customer scanned his ticket with no explanation or apology. Immediately, anger and complaints had spread across the waiting zoneShow MoreRelatedBookkeeping Essay974 Words   |  4 Pagesforms needed to run the business (Kinn’s 2007, p. 406.). These forms are an encounter form, receipt form, a ledger card and a journal entry card (Kinn’s 2007, p.406). The peg-board system is considered a fast and simple form of bookkeeping. It only requires the bookkeeper to write the information once and with the use of carbon paper, the entry is placed on all of the necessary documents (Kinn’s 2007, p.406). The encounter form is used to document the visit and the patient’s information (ElsevierRead MoreOutline Of A Business On Ikea1094 Words à ‚  |  5 Pagespresent IKEA has continued to grow and it has reached the markets of USA, Italy, France, Japan, China and Russia (IKEA, n.d.). At the end of 2014 there were a total of 361 stores in more than 40 countries (IKEA, 2014). Initial and current products/services. In its beginnings IKEA sold its products via mail order. Those products were fish, Christmas decorations, greeting cards, pencils, ballpoint pens and flower seeds from the family farm (Ikea, n.d.). A few years later furniture was added to the productRead MoreIs Service Marketing Different Form Product1442 Words   |  6 PagesDEBATE—Is Service Marketing Different From Product Marketing? MARKETING DEBATE—Is Service Marketing Different From Product Marketing? Marketing is the process of communicating the value of a product or service to customers. In addition, marketing might sometimes be interpreted as the ability of selling products and services. As the term Marketing may replace Advertising it is the overall strategy and function of promoting a product or service to the customer. Many services marketers stronglyRead MoreChild Abuse And Domestic Violence : Prevalence, Explanations, And Practice Implications Essay1239 Words   |  5 PagesJournal Articles Summary Article #1: Child Abuse in the Context of Domestic Violence: Prevalence, Explanations, and Practice Implications The journal article Child Abuse in the Context of Domestic Violence: Prevalence, Explanations, and Practice Implications, addresses three critical components in regards to child abuse resulting from domestic violence. The first component focuses on how often child abuse occurs in relation to domestically violent families. The second component of the journal articleRead MoreThe Use Of The Theory Transactional Model Of Stress And Coping1727 Words   |  7 Pagesperiod Lazarus and his colleagues describe an encounter by the person with a stressor that may have one of three types of outcomes: an irrelevant encounter of no significance, a benign-positive encounter that is considered beneficial, or a stressful encounter that is considered harmful or threatening (Lazarus, 1998). During these encounters the person is deciding in which way the stressors are significant to their well-being. A stake in the encounter generates a potential for emotions and stressfulRead MoreCommunication Acr oss Cultures : High Context Vs. Low Context1143 Words   |  5 Pagesindividuals have numerous contacts but over a short period. Beliefs and society s behavior are needed to be explained so that so that outsiders will know how to act. 3. Major Article Summary The article I chose to summarize is Low† and High†Context Communication Patterns: Towards Mapping Cross†Cultural Encounters (Korac†Kakabadse, Kouzmin, Korac†Kakabadse, Savery, 2001). This article explains the differences in each culture context. Certain countries fall into each category: †¢ High Context-CultureRead MoreSwot Analysis : Iaas On The Cloud Computing Industry1034 Words   |  5 PagesIn summary, IaaS is the highest growing segment in the cloud computing industry. Within the segment, the champion vendor is AWS as the result of its early entrance. Eyeing the potential market growth in China, AWS entered Chinese cloud computing market with Aliyun competition. Although AWS may face potential threats, such as cutthroat competition, government distrust, limited customer base, and barrier of switching, they have structured strategies to minimize the damage of said threats. Based onRead MoreArticle Review: Customers Ways of Making Sense of a Financial Service Relationship Through Intersubjective Mirroring of Others1444 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿Journal Article Review: Eriksson and Soderberg (2010) Customers Ways of Making Sense of a Financial Service Relationship Through Intersubjective Mirroring of Others. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 2010) 15 , 99-11 A. Material Evaluation Introduction The focus of this study is the review of the work of Eriksson and Soderberg (2010) which examines the importance of the existing relationships between the buyer and the seller in marketing research. Reported by Eriksson and Soderberg (2010)Read MoreService Encounters2186 Words   |  9 PagesAssignment 2 – Service Encounters GSBS 6015 20/03/16 Salam Abbas - C3261695 Lauren Romano - C3246958 Asma Suhail - C3238999 Executive Summary This report provides a summary and analysis of the current and prospective service issues faced by Sir Stamford Hotel in Sydney, NSW. The key method of research utilised is the analysis of written customer feedback on two travel review sites independent of the service provider; tripadvisor.com and expedia.com. Customer themes of satisfactionRead MoreFactors Leading For Shortage Of Primary Care Physicians1533 Words   |  7 Pagesprimary care physicians? †¢ Importance – Better preventative care to the people †¢ Conclusion B) History of primary care and primary care physicians C) Ethical issues in shortage of primary care gap D) Economic issues in primary care gap E) Summary F) Recommendations G) Conclusions Abstract The main objective of this research question is to analyze the factors that led to the shortage of primary care physicians. The

Critically evaluate the application of leadership theories - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 20 Words: 6014 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/10/10 Did you like this example? INTRODUCTION The critical component in every business is the leadership and management. A business that is well managed operates in the same manner as a well oiled machine, thus producing the results set out in the beginning. Management covers many areas in any business such as recruitment, resource acquisition, formulation of policies, resolving disputes between employees and financial management. In simple words a management system must focus in making everyone contented: the customer, investors, and   employees, without sacrificing on profit. As such any business must adopt management practices that are geared towards getting the best of everything. The fundamental aspect of any business is, first and foremost, is designing how the business will run often based on the general goals of the business and putting in practice. It defines the relationship between managers, supervisors and employees, effective ways of accomplishing goats and ensuring that employees stay motivated throughout the process, and for the longest time possible. The leadership aspect also comes in to guide the employees in their day to day activities and make decisions on behalf of the company. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Critically evaluate the application of leadership theories" essay for you Create order Management theories have evolved over time from classical theories to their application in the contemporary world. There has been a shift from top down management system, in which emphasis was on the management to the employee himself. The current employee does not like a bureaucratic management system, especially in a fast paced industry that needs new ideas every single day such as Google, which forms the basis of this reports case study.   The focus is no longer on the manager but the employee as management shifts to a more humanistic approach. The focus nowadays, as in the case of Google Inc., is more on the human relations, behavioral and social psychological. This report will focus more on the human relations approaches adopted by the tech giant. This report focuses on Google Inc. leadership and management style which has seen its employees productive and motivated over time, leading to the giant that is Google today. Google Inc. is an advertising company that sells ad space online, but to a common internet user, Google is the get way to the internet. Every internet user across the globe searches internet content through Google; news, articles, jobs. It has simplified the internet. It is hard to imagine how the internet operated before the advent of Google. In as much as Google has swept over the internet, it has also set pace for leadership and management style, where workers are highly motivated to do their jobs with least Google Inc. operates in a culture where every employee is treated equally, where no one has a superior voice or the last voice. What is treated with utmost regard at Google Inc. however is someone’s idea. To foster this kind of working environment Google’s management system got rid of hierarchies. The emphasis of the style lays in ensuring that all employees are productive in the work place. Another factor that informed Google’s leadership of this style of management is the fact that most of the engineers employed in the beginning did not hold highly the idea of management. They wanted to be left alone to work on their projects. The report entails the classical theories of management, its evolution into contemporary human based management styles.   The case study of the report is Google Inc., its metamorphosis into the tech giant that straddles Silicon Valley today, what informed its top hierarchy of the need to have a management style where employees are treated equally, the advantages of the style and lastly critical analysis of the theory and its application in Google. History and development of management theories The key to any business enterprise’s development is in its management policy. It will determine whether it will prosper and conquer the world through its ability to make decisions based on resources, goals, recruitment and expansion. The management also provides a link between the employees and the supervisors all the way to the top of the hierarchy, thus ensuring that the decisions are implemented to the later and that the employees are motivated enough to work towards the prosperity of the company and not merely make a living. The earliest management theories were the classical theories which included administrative, scientific and bureaucratic management theories. They were developed late nineteenth century and early twentieth century to help solve management problem present at that time of history. The earliest proponents of these classical management theories were social managers and of course social research scientists. Although these theories have been modified over time, some of them are still applicable around the world in modern day work place and for particularly different reasons.   Companies such as McDonald, Coca-Cola have used some of these management theories to develop their global brands to what it is today. The father of the scientific management model, Frederick Winslow Taylor developed the theory through his observations as a worker. He observed that the workers put on minimal energy into their work, something he described as soldiering (Cole Kelly, 2016). The worker was not putting in enough effort to ensure that the company was productive, may in what motivation speakers would nowadays describe as working just enough not to be sacked. He (Taylor, 1903) argued that the average worker went about their daily activities in a slow, easy gait and only after a good deal of thought and observation but worked at a faster paces when external pressure was applied. This tendency, Taylor observed, brought down the performance of even the efficient workers down to that of the least efficient workers. And his answer to this management problem was the scientific management system. In his work titles ‘The Principles of Management’, Taylor argues that management is not only theoretical, but must also be involved in the work place. He argued that both the manager and worker must collaborate in order to increase productivity in the work place rather than sharing the surplus income. This theory was developed at a time when the economical interests of the worker were not important to the management, which may have explained the slowness of the workers in the first place. To bridge the gap, managers had to be involved, as well as the conditions of the worker improved so that the productivity of the company can go up. However, the scientific management theory alienated the worker from the planning process and was reduced to repetitive procedures in the workplace. The skills of the worker were disregarded as well as their creativity in solving problems that could have arisen in within their defined areas.   The principles of the management system then contributed majorly to the stifling of the worker. These included development of each man work’s scientific element, scientific selection and training of the workman where he trained himself in the past and cooperation between the management and the workers according to the scientific laws that have been adopted as the best for the company, striping the worker of his individual problem solving skills (Taylor, 1973) Administrative management theory This theory was developed by a French mining engineer Henry Fayol. His theory on management become quite a phenomenon in the twentieth century having turned around the fortunes of a company that was on the brink of collapse.   Fayol’s key management practices included planning, forecasting, commanding, coordinating and controlling. He based findings on his managerial career, and also came up with the principles of management: division of work, authority which involved the right to issue orders, discipline in the work place, unity of command, unity of direction, subordination of individual interests, remuneration, centralization of decision making, line of authority, order which entailed both material and social order, equity, stability of tenure of personnel, initiative and spirit de Corps which ensured that the management keeps the morale of the employees high (Fayol, 1916). Bureaucratic management system Aside from the management theories developed by Taylor and Fayol, Max Weber came up with what he called ‘bureaucracy’. Weber argued that there was a tendency in people to obey those in authority over them. He says; â€Å"Bureaucracy develops the more perfectly the more it is ‘dehumanized’, the more completely it succeeds in eliminating from official business love, hatred, and all purely personal, irrational and emotional elements which escape calculation. This is appraised as its special virtue by capitalism.† (Weber, 1978) This form of organization had no regard to the employees, in other words it lacked the human aspect of the work place experiences. Workers were to submit to those in authority. Weber went further ahead and developed three forms of authority (Cole Kelly, 2016): rational authority where beliefs rested upon established laws, traditional authority where authority rested on established belief in the sanctity of immemorial traditions and lastly charismatic authority where it rested upon the exemplary character of an individual. In contrast to scientific and administrative management theories, as Cole Keller, (2016) criticize; bureaucratic organizations enable authority to be subject to published rules and practices. As such, legitimacy is laid on hierarchy rather than arbitrary. Mullin, (2000) offered his criticism of the theory arguing that it emphasizes on rules, record keeping and paper work rather than what administration was meant to serve, promotes a lack of adaptability and individuality, stifles initiatives and restriction of psychological freedom. These earliest forms of management theories have in many ways been the source of management policies and forms. Some of them are still in use today depending on the type of organization. Bureaucracy thrives best in government institutions where there’s need to obey the authority more than anything else. However some large organizations also practice the bureaucratic form. It is the discretion of the management to work out which system works best for its company and adopt it for its benefit.   For that matter, these management theories have been modified to meet the specific needs of the organization. Critique on the classical theories The changing market has necessitated many global organizations to rethink their management structures and policies. These changes include globalization where companies are increasingly seeking cheaper alternatives of producing goods due to stiff competition, competition for creative and skilled workers and climate change. What worked a century ago will not work in this very day and age. Workers demand more than they did years ago. To ensure that they are happy and productive, companies have been forced to adopt humanistic management approaches. Whereas the scientific management theory emphasized on collaboration between the management and the workman, it did not involve the worker in the formulation of the policies and procedural aspects of the company. In the current world, the worker is part and parcel of the planning process just as the execution of it. This is also aided by the fact that workers now are highly skilled and may not need any more scientific training as was the case before. The creative industry requires constant change and adoption of new ideas in order to stay up the consumer food chain. Where else can the management get its ideas than letting its employees bet autonomous in their areas of expertise at the work place? The administrative theory is partially adopted especially in the remuneration aspect and motivation of employees. The current work place dictates that the employee is left to do what the company hired him to do, without stifling his creative mind through endless orders and chains of commands. No one wants to have their idea up to be discussed three or more levels up. Many want to own their own ideas and be the one who guide the management on how it will be implemented. It’s up to the management to decide on the viability of the idea and its contribution to the company. Other than a government setting, the bureaucratic form of management is nowadays frowned upon. People want to be free, exercise their individuality and have the psychological freedom to do what they are employed to do. It is potentially dangerous to a creative industry, to have a bureaucratic form of management. The contemporary management practices dictate that the employee comes first. Management is human centered. Companies have been forced to adopt a little of every classical management theory, discarding what doesn’t work them as well as defining their own management policies in order to bring out the best in their workforce. The focus of any business entity in the present business landscape is to ensure that the business operates efficiently and achieves effectiveness through focus on specific strategic issues (Hamel, 2000).   To achieve this, a manager’s critical roles are broken into three categories: interpersonal, informational and decisional roles. In the interpersonal one he plays the role of the figurehead, a leader and a liason person. In the informational role he disseminates, monitors and is the company’s spokesperson. In the decisional role, the manager allocates resources, handles disagreements, the negotiator as well as decides the entrepreneurial di rection of the business. As Hamel (2007) posits, there’s a shift away from heavy management structure although the need to maintain efficiency through controlling and coordinating. There’s need for responsive kind of management style which is less costly as too much hierarchies have proven to be over time.   Any business needs to reduce management costs without compromising on the output. It’s critical, that as management continues to be changed, it’ should shift towards the human being who is the worker. The work place should be democratic, personalized as will shift away from mechanistic systems of bureaucracy. The advent of technological advancements means that innovation, interdependence and creativity form the centre of the organization. Managers are no longer needed to perform supervisory and administrative duties. Teams nowadays manage themselves with a team leader who informs the top management whatever they need relayed to them. In simple terms the manager’s roles are slowly going instinct (Finkle, 2012). Contemporary approach to management Even though classical approaches in management are still practiced in many business settings, they were prescriptive in nature and had their own fair share of drawbacks. However, these classical approaches have been used to define the contemporary world of management, where there’s emphasis on information sharing, non-linear system of management and formulation of strategies where everyone’s opinion is heard, considered, and if well thought out, adopted by the organization. This shows a shift to a more democratic work environment where the human aspect of work forms a fundamental aspect. (Ellinas, C., Allan, N. Johansson, A.2017) Contemporary approaches to management focus solely the behaviour of people at work. A case study of Sports Direct mistreatment of its workers represents everything that should not be done to an employee. Threats, coercion and punishment are not what make a company tick in the contemporary world of management. A human being needs to be motivated to work. The organization must offer what makes the employee eager to work (Hofstede, G. 2011). Motivation approach to management A manager should find out what makes the employee work harder and avail it to them. Mitchell (1982) argues that the aim of studying human motivation is geared towards discovering what makes a worker motivated, the triggers and what sustains that state of motivation. The manager must do this in a manner that rewards motivated works without compromising on the overall objectives of the organization. However, as much as a manager may motivate the employees, for one to act it is on the individual level (Mitchell, 1982). Every person has their own personal needs that make them motivated, that is, subscribe to different theories of motivation. Another reason why people are motivated in intention; a person is always under control of what makes them motivated, and make them do what they do at work. The third reason is that motivation has many faces. It entails what makes them motivated and the ability of the individual to work towards a particular objective. Motivation is used by managers to predict behavior among people. Nothing gets achieved by motivation alone. There must be action geared towards a specific goal, external and internal factors as well. As an example, a person who is hungry may be motivated by the desire to find food and quench his hunger. The desire to eat triggers the response which in this case may be to work or steal. Either way a response can either be satisfactory or not just as in the work place (Buchanan Huczynski, 2010). According to Buchanan and Huczynski (2010) the basic elements of understanding motivation include the drives which include basic needs which are innate determinants of human behaviour. A manager must find out the basic needs of his employees since this are the most immediate things that motivate them. If the employee cannot readily or easily fulfill what they consider basic within the organization, the manager should not be guaranteed that that employee will be productive. The second element that informs motivation is the motive. This is the unconscious day to day activities that influence human behavior to go after certain goals due to their social value in achieving them. The motives of an employee could be to take their kids to the best schools in the neighborhood, go for vacation abroad, and retire at forty and probably to afford a house at a certain location. This will drive someone to be motivated to be able to afford such a lifestyle as is determined by the society (Buchanan Huczynski, 2010). The third objective that helps understand motivation is the goals. These are the purposes that the people want or desire in their lives. They may be paying off a debt, shopping in select locations or buying a certain brand of car. In the workplace the goals would be rising up in the management ranks, salary increment or a paid vacation. The goals of any employee are important to them as the goals of a company are important (Buchanan Huczynski, 2010). There has been a fundamental shift in the style of management in the recent past, owing to researches conducted. In as much as the classical management theories are applicable in the contemporary work place, focus has shifted in having the employee motivated to work. To do this the organization has to find out what triggers the employee into working; there must be a goal, a desire and motive. The shift has seen humanistic approaches of management, which are centered on the human first and not the work they are supposed to do. It has been established that employees have motivations, and thus strive towards fulfilling whatever that motivates them. It could be social needs. It could be basic needs. It could be self-actualization (Cloke and GoldSmith, 2001) Human relation approach The human relation approach aims to show that the worker is more important than the work. Emphasis was laid more in the works behavior and their social interactions at work. An experiment known as the Hawthorn experiment was conducted to approve the importance of human relations at work. It sought to find out what made the worker content to work through varying conditions and comparing the results. It also sought to establish that human relations transcend physical contribution and include creative, emotional and understanding, communication and the ability of workers to express their opinions, offer suggestions to increase the satisfaction and improve production (Cole and Kelly, 2016). Scientists discovered that the sense of belonging to a social group was equally important both inside and outside the workplace. It reinforced the fact that human beings are social animals would love to be view as a group rather than individually. Hawthorn’s experiment established that the manager should value human interactions, foster relationships in the work place since it acts as a motivating factor if the employees feel that they are part of a group (Hassard, 2012) Social psychological school of motivation It’s clear that once a person has fulfilled both physical and social needs, they will want something more to add to their social. Social scientists call it self-actualization. The most influential proponents of this theory is Maslow (1994), Herzbert (1059), Likert (1967, Argyris (1957) and McClelland. Abraham Maslow developed what he called the hierarchy of needs. He outlined the sets of human needs based on a rank with the most basic needs (physiological) at the bottom, followed by security, belonging, self-esteem and finally self-actualization. Every worker is motivated to fulfill certain within this hierarchy and once they have done that, the person will move a rank higher to the point of self-actualization. Douglas McGregor (1966) developed a theory which he called theory x and theory y which he based on two sets of assumptions. In the first assumption (theory x) the manager views the workers as lazy, require control and have to be threatened. The worker avoids responsibility but wants security. This theory is derogatory to the worker and lacks humanistic approaches to the work place yet some still practice in their organizations. The second assumption, theory y, involves a situation where the manager views enjoy work and do not any form of threats or coercion in order to be productive. The social motivation theory that works best today is one which the employees are seen as naturally motivated by their own individual needs, based on the hierarchy of needs, and do not need any form of threats whatsoever to be productive. The case study of Sports Direct, where the workers were threatened, paid less had the least motivated employee within their ranks. There was no psychological freedom in the work place (Cherry, 2014). Google Inc. is the kind of company that has successful managed to adopt a kind of approach where the workers have the freedom to exercise their creativity as well as meet their social needs. Google has the best employee relationships so much that it relieves millions of applications every year from people who want to work with them.   It is no secret the employees are the most motivated lot. Google Inc. human relation approach to management History of Google Inc. Today’s technological giant, Google Inc. began in 1998 as an academic research project and has grown in leaps and bounds to its flotation in the stock market. The founders were two Stanford University students, Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page, whose ideas at the time would come to completely change how we experience the internet. It almost impossible to work without Google as one ‘does rounds’ in the internet.   So great is Google’s influence that it is now a verb which means to search the internet. Google began with the idea of organizing information on the web and availing them to an internet user at a very fast speed, something that now informs its mission: to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. It aimed at being the best search engine, where the user would get exactly what they wanted just by searching through the company’s web platform. Over the years, Google has evolved from just being a search engine to introducing a vast range of products such as Gmail, BlogSpot, news and advertising (through adsense and adwords) where it gets most of its revenue.   It is now a global brand, with over 43 offices across the globe, even penetrating into the Chinese market where the government has a total grip on what its people consume, even putting in place the famed Chinese firewall. Google boosts of over 37,000 employees spread across its global offices. Since its inception Google Inc. has operated entirely on its own management blue print, where there are no managers. It’s a company made by engineers for engineers, as Eric Flatt points out. Engineers do believe that their time should be spent designing and not playing a supervisory roles and view management as destructive. They wanted to spend their time creating and innovating, not managing others. They felt that it decreased their productivity or reduced their progress, hence the need to do away with managers. Google’s founders, a few years after the birth of what would soon be a technological giant, did away with management and adopted a flat organization where everyone was equal. This was to ensure rapid conception and development of ideas which necessitated the doing away of bureaucracy. Google was in a way dismantling all management theories that had been in use for long, went about its business in an informal kind of way but without sacrificing on the need for innovative aspect of the company. However they were forced to relent to the idea of having manager when its engineers incessantly went to Page to seek clarifications and even solve disputes. It is here that they learnt a valuable lesson on managers and their contribution to the organization of the company.   Even then the company does not have many managers in its 37,000 workforce. It has 5,000 managers who help employees decide on the most important projects, communicate to employees about the strategy as well as ensuring facilitating collaboration.   This is when they realized that they couldn’t wholly do away with the idea of management. Someone had to take responsibility of some functions and had to do so without interfering with the rapid generation of innovative ideas from the employees (Economist, 2004). Google does not value hierarchy and emphasizes on the individual during it recruitment. It values expertise, problem solving skills and the best ideas at the expense of authority or the hierarchy (Heimsch, 2011). Everyone has an equal chance of having their ideas adopted so long as it makes practical sense to the company. As Flatt notes, â€Å"There is only so much you can meddle when you have 30 people on your team, so you have to focus on creating the best environment for engineers to make things happen,† he notes The company has a single status policy that says that every employee has an equal chance to be heard. Google’s Chairman Eric Schmidt once said in an interview â€Å"No particular person has a strong say†¦.At Google, everyone is the same.† An employee agreed with his sentiments saying that, â€Å"You have an equal seat at the table, and it’s based on the power of your idea, not how long you’ve been here, tenure, title or anything. In my first week here, I was shocked that for the product I was working on, the product manager was straight out of college. She was making decisions about delaying the product. In every other company I have worked in, it had to go up to three levels of VPs before you could say that you were pushing out the schedule.† Google has strived to cultivate a culture where sharing of ideas is the ultimate aim of the setting. Nobody has the monopoly of ideas, only the best ideas have the monopoly at Google. This creates a comfortable environment as it is outlined in the website. Though Google has grown a lot since it opened in 1998, we still maintain a small company feel. At lunchtime, almost everyone eats in the office cafà ©, sitting at whatever table has an opening and enjoying conversations with Googlers from different teams. Our commitment to innovation depends on everyone being comfortable sharing ideas and opinions. The freedom that these employees get accorded with it does not come without a price. And the price is responsibility. In their recruitment exercises Google hiring team ensures that they select the best brains in the industry, people who are highly motivated by the vision of Google and are willing to go beyond their own needs to see it accomplished. One of the key requirements Google Inc. as an employee is to fully utilize the skills that one has and to exercise their creativity without restrictions. The company rewards handsomely those who come up with innovative ideas. Google urges its employees to devote seventy percent of their time on Google’s core business which is advertising and search engine, twenty percent of the time on things related to the core-business that were not included in the budget and the ten percent of their time on pursuing ideas that relate to one’s core competencies. The managers at Google do not micromanage the employees under them, allows the freedom for one to exercise their creativity and offers advice when needs be, trusts the abilities of the people she is entrusted and advocates for team work with others outside their team. Managers give responsibilities to others as a sign of trust as one employee spoke in a survey; â€Å"My manager was able to see my potential and gave me opportunities that allowed me to shine and grow. For example, early on in my role, she asked me to pull together a cross-functional team to develop a goal setting process. I was new to the role, so she figured it would be a great way for me to get to know the team and also to create accountability and transparency. Once it was developed, she sent me to one of our Europe offices—on my own!—to deliver the training to people managers there.† With the best managers, Google ensures that the best comes of the people they hire. People are generally happy working under the best people. As such Google has defined the following characteristics of good mangers; be good coaches, empowers the team but not micromanage, show interest in the team member’s well-being, results oriented and productive, a good communicator, ensure that employees advance their careers, have a clear vision and strategy for the team and finally the technical skills in order to offer advice (Block, 2016). From these characteristics it is plausible to deduce that the managers work for the workers and not the other way round. Left to do their own work as they see fit, Google employees do not have time to communicate, supervise and motivate others at the same time concentrate on their own creative endeavors. Google has devised a system of management where it can accommodate the employees’ needs, aspirations and desires, through incentives that go beyond remuneration. Some of the needs of the employees, such as bringing their pets to work, are some of the needs that cannot be captured through monetary incentives. It’s all about understanding the needs of the employee and creating an enabling environment. Social researchers deduced that human being are social beings and not robots, hence the need to find out what triggers them into action. Finding out the triggers makes it possible for any company to tailor its policies towards creating such triggers and enabling the employees to be creative and innovative. Goolge Inc. operates in an environment where ideas are the most important element, as such must create a way of making sure that the best ideas are rapidly absorbed into the company for it to grow and stay as the leader in the market. The approach of Google seems atypical to normal organizations that still follow the classical approaches to management. The leaders at Google have however veered off the trajectory of management since the tech industry needs innovators with ideas that need to be implemented quickly. Having many hierarchies would be an impediment to idea formulation, development hence the need to have the employees working on their own ideas as well as implementing them as best as they know it. Employee motivation In addition to granting the employees the freedom to exercise their creativity, Google ensures that its employees do not get disturbed by off-work related issues, giving them ample time to devote to the core business of the company. It’s the company’s admission that the worker is human first, with needs that needs to be fulfilled; otherwise they’d be out there unbothered by Google’s vision and goals. Google has made it possible for the employee to have an environment that is stress free. It provides a wide range of services and facilities to its employees, some that are not available anywhere. These include snacks, massage, gyms, commuting buses complete with bike racks, internet access, car-washes, laundry services and even the gym (Frangos, 2016). It includes virtually everything an employee would dream off. The environment as pleasant as it is, has essential elements to it as outlined in its website: Local expressions of each location, from a mural in Buenos Aires to ski gondolas in Zurich, showcasing each office’s region and personality. Bicycles or scooters for efficient travel between meetings; dogs; lava lamps; massage chairs; large inflatable balls. Googlers sharing cubes, yurts and huddle rooms – and very few solo offices. Laptops everywhere – standard issue for mobile coding, email on the go and note?taking. Foosball, pool tables, volleyball courts, assorted video games, pianos, ping pong tables, and gyms that offer yoga and dance classes. Grassroots employee groups for all interests, like meditation, film, wine tasting and salsa dancing. Healthy lunches and dinners for all staff at a variety of cafà ©s. Break rooms packed with a variety of snacks and drinks to keep Googlers going. These kinds of facilities have paid off to Google. The employees are innovative and creative, a thing that has seen the company grow exponentially over the years. There are minimal distractions at work, since the most basic needs have been well taken care of. The company also offers attractive pay packages to its employees as well defined on its website According to the Google web site, â€Å"We provide individually?tailored compensation packages that can be comprised of competitive salary, bonus, and equity components, along with the opportunity to earn further financial bonuses and rewards.† Following Maslow’s hierarchy of needs as a motivation to work, Google has developed philosophies that ensure that everyone who contributes to its company in whatever form has their needs, goals and desires catered for. It says: We strive to be innovative and unique in all services we provide both to customers and employees, including our benefits and perks offerings. We realize and celebrate that our employees have diverse needs, and that this diversity requires flexible and individually directed support. Our priority is to offer a customizable program that can be tailored to the specific needs of each individual, whether they enjoy ice climbing in Alaska, want to retire by age 40, or plan to adopt 3 children.† Google offers a range of benefits, beyond the usual remuneration. They include: health and wellness which entail medical insurance, retirement and savings where Google tops up according to their plans and the employees, paid vacations of up to 25 days on the sixth year since working for Google, other benefits that include bonuses on referring someone, tuition reimbursement as well as adoption assistance. Critique Google’s approach to human relation system of management cannot be applicable in each and every other institution. Google is a tech giant and is able to implement a raft of measures for its employees without denting its financial capabilities. Other organizations will crumble should they attempt the kind of employee motivation as Google’s. As such it is important for each and every organization to devise ways in which its employees can stay motivated and happy working for it. Another factor that makes Google’s approach inapplicable to the fact that the tech industry requires ideas and rapid flow of ideas. Some organizations work best with the bureaucratic kind of management because there’s no need of rapid idea development. Conclusion Google Inc. has successfully adopted a human based management theory where emphasis is on the employee first. It remains fundamental to Google’s core values that the employee must have their social and physical needs in order to work as effectively as required. In making the employee as comfortable as possible, google has also managed to give them freedom to exercise their creativity without so much bureaucratic kind of decision making. The concept of adopting the best idea gives the employees free reign in their work place. The role of the manager is to work for them and not the other way round. Google’s model of management signals a major shift in human management, that to make the best out the employees, it best to minimize management as well as creating an atmosphere that works best for the employees.

A Perfect Competition Industry Framework Essay - 919 Words

Introduction: Market structure is best described as the authoritative and different parts of a business sector. A perfect competition industry framework is one that involves various little venders and purchasers while a monopolistic competition relates to an industry foundation that has attributes of rivalry and imposing business model. A pure monopoly model industry base contains a solitary maker or supplier of an item or an administration that has no nearby substitutes while Oligopoly is an industry framework that is commanded by a set number of firms that capacity autonomously of each other. Analysis: In perfectly and. incompletely forceful markets is it fitting to expect advantage extension regarding firms. At the begin we should see that any advantage. Real .acknowledged by a business has a spot with the business owner(s).For that countless associations with emerge proprietor chief, decisions concerning what things to pass on, whom to use, what expense to charge, and so forth., will be energetically influenced by the way the proprietor s advantage is affected. Proprietors of such organizations may well have objectives, for example, early retirement or costly instructions for their youngsters.. These objectives, in any case, are not inconsistent with the supposition of benefit amplification..Since cash is a way to numerous closes,. early retirement or school instructions can all the more effectively be managed when the proprietor profits.. A conceivable issue withShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of Porter s Five Forces Of Competition Framework1539 Words   |  7 Pagesmethodologies that can be used to analyze the industry that a company is in. In chapter 3 of the text some of the main topics include industry profitability and attractiveness which can be analyzed by using â€Å"Porter’s Five Forces of Competition Framework† (Grant, 2010; pg 69). The five forces include competition from substitutes, new market entrants, and established firms as well as the power of buyers and suppliers. One of the main topics with this framework is the availability of substitutes whichRead MoreThe Impact Of Global Market On The Global Economy1533 Words   |  7 PagesLike many industries, the high end fashion otherwise known as the luxury goods industry, experienced challenging times during the recent recession†. In 2008, banks were falling left and right, unemployment rates sky high, and consumer confidence at an all-time low. In 2009, total luxury goods industry sales fell by 20 percent. There are many perspectives on how and what strategies firms should deploy in order to become and remain competitive. According to Peng, (2014), â€Å"the industry-based viewRead MoreA Research Study On An Academic Research Essay1658 Words   |  7 Pageswill entail research on the Perfect Competition Theory to determine its validity and reliability in market analysis. Firstly, the paper will outline the objectives of the research and provide methodologies applied. Secondly, it will outline the targeted readers and how they can apply facts in this paper. Thirdly, the paper will give a general review of the Perfect Competition Theory. Fourthly, the study will analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the perfect competition and give argument against thisRead MoreDifferentiating Between Market Structures Essay1077 Words   |  5 PagesCoal, Chemical and Forest Products. The Advantages and Limitation of supply and demand The first scenario, the author has to decide whether to continue operations or shut down operations. The author has decided to continue operations in the perfect competition market. In the scenario the market demand curve is downward sloping, each seller perceives the individual demand curve facing him or her to be perfectly elastic at a given price. Given this scenario this demand curve and the cost structuresRead MorePorter Five Forces Analysis1500 Words   |  6 Pagesfive forces analysis  is a framework for industry analysis and business strategy development. It draws upon  industrial organization (IO) economics  to derive five forces that determine the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of a  market. Attractiveness in this context refers to the overall industry profitability. An unattractive industry is one in which the combination of these five forces acts to drive down overall profitability. A very unattractive industry would be one approachingRead Mor eThe Five Forces-General Assumption1099 Words   |  5 Pagescompetitors Profitable markets that yield high returns will attract new firms. This results in many new entrants, which eventually will decrease profitability for all firms in the industry. Unless the entry of new firms can be blocked by incumbents, the abnormal profit rate will fall towards zero (perfect competition). * The existence of barriers to entry (patents, rights, etc.) The most attractive segment is one in which entry barriers are high and exit barriers are low. Few new firms can enterRead MorePorter s Five Forces Framework992 Words   |  4 PagesFive Forces Framework is a tool for analyzing competition of a business of an industry in terms of its profitability. The most unattractive industry would be one approaching pure competition, in which available profits for all firms are driven to normal profit levels. The five-forces perspective is associated with its originator, Michael E. Porter of Harvard University. This framework was first published in Harvard Business Review in 1979. Each industry generates profits, and the industry competesRead MoreU.s. Porter s Strategic Decisions1520 Words   |  7 PagesINTRODUCTION Michael Porter, a Harvard alumni, developed the Porter analysis in 1979 (MindTools). This framework uses five forces to determine where the power is allocated within an industry and the attractiveness of operating within it. This is beneficial to understand the strength of a company and its current competitive position in its industry, or to examine the possibility of entering a new industry. For the purpose of this paper I am going to examine the weaknesses of this analysis in making strategicRead MoreCoca Cola As A Multinational Beverage Company Essay1484 Words   |  6 Pagesdrug specialist John Stith Pemberton in Columbus, Georgia. The Coca-Cola recipe and brand was purchased in 1889 by Asa Griggs Candler, who consolidated The Coca-Cola Company in 1892 (Bodden, 2009). The organization works a franchised circulation framework dating from 1889 where The Coca-Cola Company just delivers syrup concentrate which is then sold to different bottlers all through the world who hold a selec ted domain. All in all, the Coca-Cola Company and its auxiliaries just deliver syrup concentrateRead MoreDegusa Essay1491 Words   |  6 Pagesof entry: greenfield, joint venture or acquisition. FDI or non-FDI? We can find multiple reasons within OLI framework (Dunning, 2000) for Degussa to go with FDI in China. In terms of ownership (O) of valuable competitive advantages we should mention advanced product technology (high standard products including proprietary products and over 300 patent families), process technology (â€Å"Perfect Plant† concept introduced in all its plants for improved cost efficiency) and product reliability (ISO certification

Innovation & Sustainable Business Development-Free-Samples

Question: Develop your understanding of the Business Model as a Concept and how a theoretical understanding of Business Models can be used to Explain value creation. Answer: Introduction A business model is a concise and distinct way of picturing the way in which a business operates. It should be possible for the management to describe their business model in a few sentences. It is the aim of every company to provide their customers with value. The stronger the value they provide, especially if compared with their competitors, the more probable it is that the company would have a large number of people purchasing from them. The business model is just a mean of translating the value proposition provided to customers into a potential for swift revenue growth. All the processes and policies of the business are a part of the business model. According to management expert, Peter Drucker (2017) a business model provides answers to the following questions: Who is the customer? What does the customer value? How value is delivered at an appropriate cost? Discussion With research streams contributing extensively to the business model concept, the stream that has contributed the greatest attention to business models is e-business. E-business implies doing business electronically. It contains of e-markets, internet-based business, and e-commerce. It takes into consideration hose business that are carried out exclusively over the internet as a form of business that makes use of the potential present in the internet as a form of complement to a businesss existing operations. Only those business that are into commercial transactions with their customers and business partners are considered as e-businesses, not counting those who just use websites for displaying their products and services that they are selling in the physical world. The recent advancements in communication and information techniques, like the advent and rapid development of the web and the swift degeneration in the communication and computing costs, have made it possible for the deve lopment of new and innovative ways of creating and delivering value, which have provided scope for the generation of traditional exchange mechanism and transaction architectures (Fielt, 2013). The overall aim of the business model of a focal firm is exploiting any business opportunity in creating value for the involved parties. This aim is reflected in the consumer value proposition and is characterized as a value creating insight that turns any firm. In these type of firms an activity in a business model is regarded as human engagement, physical and/or material assets of any of the party to the business model, for serving any particular purpose for the fulfillment of the whole objective. An activity system is therefore a set of codependent organizational activities focused on the firm, comprising those carried out by the firm, their partners, suppliers or consumers (Amit Zott, 2012). In analyzing business models in terms of cost/revenue architecture, they can be addressed in the domains of innovation and technology management. Two complimentary views dominate the domain: companies commercialize the new ideas and technologies with the help of their business models, and business models signify a new aspect of innovation that covers the conventional modes of procedure, product and structural innovation and even includes new forms of collaboration and cooperation. Business models not just entails outcomes for technological innovations, they even get shaped by them. Other than adopting business models for facilitating technological innovation and management of technology, businesses also can consider the business model as an origin of innovation in and of itself (Iacob et al., 2014). Exploring the seven components inside business model, scope, goal, key resources, key activities, value proposition, customer channels and customer relationship, resulted in a thorough assessment on how the sensing, seizing and transforming competences of the firm can be made use of for bringing dynamism to every component and even to the whole organizations business model. An evaluation of the practical circumstances of corporations would show that there exists interconnectivity and mutual dependence inside those organizations of the components of the business model, along with some possibly iterative and linear relationships. Some of the components are capable of fostering dynamism, others are capable of impeding dynamism. It has been seen that organizations always focus on only some aspects of their business model, putting in the maximum energy, resources and time in those aspects. These aspects more often than not result in either dynamism or even initiate dynamism in some other aspects of the business model. Pursuit of dynamism in organizations in one aspect often goes on to the initiation of dynamism in several other aspects. There is the existence of multiple business models at both the whole organizational level and even at the distinctive business unit level (Schneider Spieth, 2013). A business context is a type of context where a particular vocabulary is engaged. This might be an individual organization, a specific project, or a larger business community. The business context decides the scope for gathering and agreement of requirements. Clearing out the shared purpose is important for attaining working interoperability. All the other subsequent needs gathering and interoperability design ought to be concentrated on the satisfaction of the shared purpose inside the capacity of the business context, even though a separation of functionality might be selected for achieving incremental progress (Bratton Gold, 2012). In todays organizations, change is inevitable. Organizations are facing today a dynamic and changing environment. To survive in todays global economy, organizations need to be flexible and readily adapt to the ever-changing marketplace. Change has turned out be the norm. It is as important for organizations in paying attention to the social and psychol ogical aspects of change as they do to the other technological aspects. Driven by the factors inside the business itself, like wishing for reposition of the business in the market or for implementing a new business model or for merging with another business or for expanding into a fresh market, change happens. External factors like demographic changes, market rivalry, new government regulations and disruptive technologies drive change (Cummings Worley, 2014). In case of big data and analytics, the shift from hype to action has been enabled by the rise in offerings around analytics in the cloud. This approach has allowed organizations in focusing on their core business, initiate faster innovation, achieving quick wins and reduce risks, irrespective of whether it is software as a service or hosted solution (Chaston, 2015). A good example of an Australian company that has started addressing this trend is RightShip. RightShip, a Melbourne based third party ship vetting agency has redeveloped their online ship vetting information system (SVIS) with the help of business analytics software from IBM. RightShip is using the Softlayer cloud platform for managing and analysing the data that will be generated by the IBM analytics software, which in turn would allow the company to focus on the core business of offering risk and vetting help for the maritime industry. With the help of predictive analytics and reporting, SVIS 2.0 is planned for providin g RightShip customers admittance to information like inspection records and ship ownership details. This has allowed customers to perform proper risk forecasting on nominated vessels (RightShip, 2017). At RightShip, the SVIS 2.0 system is available through the companys website and it holds data regarding approximately 71,000 ships and thousands of maritime companies. With the collaboration with IBM and getting access to their business analytics technology, RightShip has realized the benefit of Big Data in delivering the most urbane, enterprise-ready risk management system accessible to the marine industry through an upgrading to its Ship Vetting Information System (SVIS). SVIS is an industry standard and it cannot be altered without any consultation and change management processes. RightShip is a business-to-business tool and from their usage analytics they have seen that there is a greater use of mobile. The new system allowed RightShip to execute better and target inferior performance and estimate risk animatedly as a reply to altering factors. Design firm Reactive has been hired by them has been given the task of redesigning the website for mobile devices. They moved into a HTML 5 front end so that they have to rec-factor code for supporting the latest user interface. Dubbed SVIS 2.0, the system would be leveraging IBMs advanced predictive analytics and real-time reportingfor providing customers with instant access to a wealth of information and permit the in undertaking extremely accurate risk forecasting (Nabi, 2016). Conclusion On a concluding note, developing the understanding of business model as a concept, and grasping their theoretical underlining are useful in explaining value creation, value appropriation and the innovation process at firms in real-life. Among the business model concepts, three warrant some amount of discretion, (1) e-business model archetypes, (2) business model as activity system, and (3) business model as cost/revenue architecture. These three come under the umbrella theme of business model and suggest there are possibly a number of ways in which a problem can be approached to effectively analyze a business model, design or redesign it. The discussion also suggested that the concept of business model, in consideration of real problems, needs approaching with a particular business context in mind and find out how much change is inevitable Reference and Bibliography Amit, R., Zott, C. (2012). Creating value through business model innovation.MIT Sloan Management Review,53(3), 41. Boons, F., Ldeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda.Journal of Cleaner Production,45, 9-19. Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J., Wagner, M. (2013). Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview.Journal of Cleaner Production,45, 1-8. Bratton, J., Gold, J. (2012).Human resource management: theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan. Chaston, I. (2015). Big Data and Analytics. InInternet Marketing and Big Data Exploitation(pp. 23-41). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Cummings, T. G., Worley, C. G. (2014).Organization development and change. Cengage learning. Drucker, P. F. (2017).The Theory of the Business (Harvard Business Review Classics). Harvard Business Press. Fielt, E. (2013). Conceptualising business models: Definitions, frameworks and classifications.Journal of Business Models,1(1), 85. Iacob, M. E., Meertens, L. O., Jonkers, H., Quartel, D. A., Nieuwenhuis, L. J., van Sinderen, M. J. (2014). From enterprise architecture to business models and back.Software Systems Modeling,13(3), 1059-1083. Katzenbach, J. R., Smith, D. K. (2015).The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business Review Press. Nabi, Z. (2016). The Hitchhikers Guide to Big Data. InPro Spark Streaming(pp. 1-8). Apress. Richter, M. (2013). Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy.Energy Policy,62, 1226-1237. RightShip. (2017).Site.rightship.com. Retrieved 25 August 2017, from https://site.rightship.com/ Schaltegger, S., Ldeke-Freund, F., Hansen, E. G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability.International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development,6(2), 95-119. Schneider, S., Spieth, P. (2013). Business model innovation: Towards an integrated future research agenda.International Journal of Innovation Management,17(01), 1340001. Schoenherr, T. (2012). The role of environmental management in sustainable business development: a multi-country investigation.International Journal of Production Economics,140(1), 1